Comparing Tavassoli et al. (2019) Versus Risdianto et al. (2024)

When comparing these two references, Tavassoli et al. (2019) and Risdianto et al. (2024), we can assess their strengths and weaknesses based on the scope, methodology, context, and contribution to the field.

### **Strengths and Weaknesses of Tavassoli et al. (2019)**

**Strengths:**

1. **Established Journal**: Published in *Discourse & Society*, a well-regarded journal with a strong reputation in the field of discourse analysis and social linguistics.

2. **Focus on a Global Issue**: The study addresses the Syrian refugee crisis, a major global issue, allowing for broader relevance and interest.

3. **Appraisal Theory Application**: The paper effectively uses Martin and White's appraisal framework, offering a nuanced analysis of how British newspapers framed the refugee crisis.

4. **Comparative Analysis**: The study compares different newspapers, providing insights into how media stance varies across different outlets within the same cultural context.

**Weaknesses:**

1. **Context-Specific**: The focus on British newspapers may limit the applicability of findings to other cultural or media contexts.

2. **Time-Specific**: Given the rapidly changing nature of news, the study’s findings might be less relevant as the political and social context evolves.

3. **Broad Analysis**: The study might not delve deeply into ideological underpinnings beyond the surface-level stance, leaving some aspects of the media's ideological role unexplored.

### **Strengths and Weaknesses of Risdianto et al. (2024)**

**Strengths:**

1. **Focused on National Context**: The study analyzes Indonesian media’s portrayal of the state capital relocation, offering insights specific to Indonesia's socio-political context.

2. **Recent Publication**: As a 2024 study, it addresses a current issue, providing fresh data and perspectives that may reflect the latest media trends.

3. **Ideological Analysis**: The study not only applies the appraisal framework but also explicitly connects the linguistic analysis to the realization of ideology, potentially offering a more in-depth exploration of how language serves ideological purposes.

4. **Expands on Previous Research**: By focusing on a different cultural context and a distinct political issue, this study adds to the body of knowledge in the field by offering a comparison to other studies, including those like Tavassoli et al. (2019).

**Weaknesses:**

1. **Lesser-Known Journal**: Published in the *International Journal of Society, Culture & Language*, which may not have the same level of recognition or impact as *Discourse & Society*.

2. **Narrower Scope**: The focus on Indonesian news texts about the state capital relocation might limit the study’s relevance to readers outside of Indonesia or those not interested in that specific issue.

3. **Potential for Lesser Citations**: Due to the journal’s potentially lower impact, this study might not receive as much attention or citations as Tavassoli et al. (2019).

### **Comparison Summary:**

- **Scope and Impact**: Tavassoli et al. (2019) has a broader impact due to its focus on a global issue and publication in a highly reputable journal, whereas Risdianto et al. (2024) offers more specific insights into Indonesian media but is published in a less widely recognized journal.

- **Ideological Analysis**: Risdianto et al. (2024) may provide a more detailed exploration of ideology within media texts, potentially offering more depth in this specific area compared to Tavassoli et al. (2019), which might focus more on media stance without fully unpacking ideological implications.