Appraisal and ideology in news text reportage

 The theoretical contribution of the paper "Appraisal and Ideology Realization in Indonesia State Capital Relocation News Texts" can be summarized into several key points:

1. **Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL) Framework**:

   - The paper utilizes the SFL framework, specifically the appraisal system, to analyze news texts regarding the relocation of Indonesia's capital city. This framework provides a detailed method for examining how language constructs and conveys attitudes, engagement, and graduation in media discourse (Martin & White, 2005) [1].

2. **Appraisal System Analysis**:

   - The study categorizes appraisal into three domains: attitude, graduation, and engagement. It demonstrates how these domains are used to shape public perceptions of the capital relocation project. For instance, the analysis shows a predominance of positive attitudes (67.2%) and heterogloss engagement (91.8%) in the news texts, indicating diverse perspectives and nuanced reporting (Risdianto et al., 2024) [1].

3. **Ideological Orientations and Media Representation**:

   - The paper highlights how ideological orientations shape the construction of social and political values in news reporting. It reveals that different media outlets have distinct ideological leanings, influencing their coverage of the capital relocation project. For example, Kompas and Jawa Pos present more balanced approaches, while Republika and Media Indonesia exhibit stronger alignments with the government's narrative (Risdianto et al., 2024) [1].

4. **Graduation Markers and Rhetorical Strategies**:

   - The analysis of graduation markers shows a predominance of Raising/Sharpening markers over Lowering/Softening markers. This indicates a rhetorical strategy emphasizing the strength and importance of entities or actions associated with the state capital relocation. This pattern suggests that news outlets use language to modulate the intensity of language and influence public opinion (Caple & Bednarek, 2013) [1].

5. **Engagement in Media Discourse**:

   - The study demonstrates that engagement in media discourse is predominantly heterogloss, indicating diverse perspectives and voices within news texts. This diversity allows for a more nuanced understanding of the issue, fostering critical thinking and enabling readers to form independent judgments (Risdianto et al., 2024) [1].

6. **Implications for Media Studies and Public Discourse**:

   - The findings have significant implications for media studies and public discourse. They emphasize the importance of media plurality and freedom of expression in democratic societies. The study underscores the need for balanced negative and positive evaluations in news reporting to promote informed citizenship and accountability in governance (Risdianto et al., 2024) [1].

7. **Critical Literacy and Media Plurality**:

   - The paper highlights the necessity of critical literacy in analyzing and interpreting news texts, particularly concerning constructing ideology and framing contentious issues like urban development and governance. It also underscores the importance of media plurality and diversity of voices within the news media (Risdianto et al., 2024) [1].

Overall, the paper contributes to the field of media studies by providing a detailed analysis of how language constructs and conveys ideological stances in news reporting, particularly in the context of a contentious issue like the relocation of Indonesia's capital city. It offers insights into the rhetorical strategies used by different media outlets to shape public perceptions and influences policy outcomes.

Citations:

[1] https://ppl-ai-file-upload.s3.amazonaws.com/web/direct-files/56908/c3d30f75-327a-4852-aa3b-543216a3fc82/IJSCL_Volume-12_Issue-2_Pages-74-88.pdf

No comments:

Post a Comment

Thanks for your comment...I am looking forward your next visit..