Previous study:
Integrating Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL) and pragmatics offers valuable approaches for analyzing language in context. Llinares (2015) proposes combining SFL with classroom interactional approaches to understand content and language integration in CLIL settings. Ryshina-Pankova (2019) demonstrates how SFL can provide new perspectives on L2 pragmatics research and instruction, focusing on language functions in social contexts. Manfredi (2012) presents an SFL-informed approach to translation practice, integrating insights from Translation Studies for both production and evaluation of target texts. Lecompte-Van Poucke (2021) introduces a pragma-functional approach that combines SFL with argumentation theory, critical theory, and postcolonial insights for analyzing intercultural conflict discourses. These studies highlight the potential of integrating SFL and pragmatics to examine language use across various domains, including education (Llinares, 2015; Ryshina-Pankova, 2019), translation (Manfredi, 2012), and political discourse analysis (Lecompte-Van Poucke, 2021). source: https://elicit.com/notebook/f65c6757-e9df-4831-bda6-31ab035c2a55
Several approaches and models can be considered to explore the integration of Sociolinguistic Frameworks (SLF) and pragmatics. These frameworks help us understand how language functions in social contexts, particularly in meaning-making and communication dynamics. Here are some potential approaches and models:
## Approaches to Integration
**1. Mixed Methods Research (MMR):**
- **Sequential Exploratory Design:** This involves collecting qualitative data first, followed by quantitative data to validate or expand on the qualitative findings. A joint display can be used to visually integrate these findings, allowing for a comprehensive analysis of how sociolinguistic factors influence pragmatic interpretation [1].
- **Pillar Integration Process (PIP):** This systematic approach involves listing, matching, checking, and building pillars from both qualitative and quantitative data. It emphasizes the interdependence of different data types, which is crucial for understanding complex sociolinguistic phenomena [1].
**2. Bayesian Models:**
- These models allow for the integration of various types of data, including linguistic signals and emotional expressions. By employing probabilistic reasoning, researchers can analyze how speakers' intentions and listeners' interpretations interact within social contexts [2]. This approach is particularly useful for understanding the nuances of pragmatic inference in communication.
**3. Pragmatic-Phonetic Integration:**
- Research has shown that listeners integrate pragmatic cues with phonetic information during word recognition tasks. This suggests that sociolinguistic factors can influence how phonetic ambiguities are resolved based on contextual expectations [3]. Analyzing this integration can provide insights into how social context affects language processing.
## Models of Analysis
**1. Relevance Theory:**
- This theory posits that communication is guided by the pursuit of relevance, where speakers aim to convey messages that are most beneficial for listeners with minimal cognitive effort. Integrating SLF with Relevance Theory can elucidate how social contexts shape communicative strategies [4].
**2. Speech Act Theory:**
- This model focuses on how utterances function as actions within social interactions. By applying Speech Act Theory alongside SLF, researchers can analyze how language use reflects social dynamics and intentions in discourse [5].
**3. Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA):**
- CDA examines the relationship between language and power within social contexts. Integrating SLF with CDA allows for a deeper understanding of how sociolinguistic variables influence discourse practices and the implications for social relations [5].
## Conclusion
Integrating Sociolinguistic Frameworks with pragmatics requires a multifaceted approach encompassing various research methodologies and theoretical models. Researchers can gain comprehensive insights into the interplay between language use and social context by employing mixed methods research, Bayesian models, and established theories like Relevance Theory and Speech Act Theory.
Citations:
[1] https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09593985.2022.2120375
[2] https://langcog.stanford.edu/papers_new/EmoRSA.pdf
[3] https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4351257/
[4] https://discourseanalyzer.com/pragmatic-theories-and-models-in-discourse-analysis/
[5] https://ejournal.unitomo.ac.id/index.php/eckll/article/download/5601/2787
[6] https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0749379713002651
[7] https://jurnal.stkipmb.ac.id/index.php/jelita/article/view/106
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thanks for your comment...I am looking forward your next visit..