Tuturan Fatis

 


Kerangka teori **tuturan fatis** pertama kali diperkenalkan oleh **Bronislaw Malinowski**, seorang antropolog yang meneliti masyarakat Papua Nugini. Tuturan fatis merujuk pada penggunaan bahasa yang tujuannya bukan untuk menyampaikan informasi atau ide, tetapi lebih untuk menjalin hubungan sosial atau menjaga keakraban. Tuturan ini seringkali terjadi dalam interaksi sehari-hari dan mencakup ungkapan-ungkapan yang bersifat rutin atau basa-basi.

### Teori Malinowski

Malinowski mengemukakan bahwa bahasa tidak hanya digunakan untuk menyampaikan informasi, tetapi juga sebagai alat untuk memperkuat ikatan sosial. Dalam konteks tuturan fatis, interaksi verbal bukan bertujuan untuk menyampaikan sesuatu yang informatif, tetapi lebih untuk "menjaga kontak" atau mempertahankan hubungan sosial antarindividu.

a timeline of key developments of Classroom Discourse analysis

 The study of classroom discourse has a rich and evolving history, with significant milestones and contributions from various researchers. Here is a timeline of key developments:

1. **Early Work (1970s)**

   - **Flanders (1970)**: Used an "introspective" a priori approach to study classroom discourse, as noted by Flowerdew (1990) and Love (1991) [1].

   - **Mehan (1979)** and **Erickson and associates (1981, 1982)**: Employed educational ethnography to analyze classroom interactions [1].

2. **Sinclair and Coulthard (1975)**

   - Introduced a comprehensive system of discourse analysis, which treated classroom discourse as a structured and hierarchical system. Their framework included five levels: acts, moves, exchanges, transactions, and interactions [1][4].

Halliday's Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL) and van Dijk's Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA)

 

The correlation between Halliday's Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL) and van Dijk's Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) provides a rich framework for analyzing interpersonal meaning, especially when examining violent statements on social media. Here's how the two can be theoretically integrated:

### 1. **Halliday's SFL (Interpersonal Metafunction)**
Halliday's **SFL** focuses on how language functions in social contexts to convey meaning. Within SFL, the **interpersonal metafunction** is concerned with the relationships between speakers and listeners (or writers and readers), examining how language is used to express attitudes, judgments, and relationships. In analyzing violent statements, the interpersonal metafunction is useful for looking at:

Enhancing Scholarly Writing: Insights from the Workshop at Universitas Negeri Malang


In pursuit of academic excellence and the dissemination of knowledge, the Department of English at the Faculty of Letters, Universitas Negeri Malang, orchestrated a transformative workshop on May 31, 2023. With the theme, “Improving Writing and Submission of Articles in Indexed Journals,” this event provided a platform for students, scholars, and researchers to refine their academic writing skills. The guest speaker, Faizal Risdianto, S.S., M.Hum., from UIN Salatiga, offered invaluable insights into the expectations of journal editors, shedding light on the path to successful publication.

The workshop was a timely response to the growing importance of academic research and publication in today’s academic landscape. The ability to communicate research findings effectively and navigate the intricacies of the publication process is indispensable for scholars and aspiring academics.

Faizal Risdianto, an accomplished scholar in his own right, brought a wealth of experience as a guest speaker. His presentation centred on the intricate journey from ideation to publication, offering a roadmap for aspiring authors. He highlighted the significance of clarity, structure, and originality in scholarly writing. Faizal Risdianto underscored the importance of adhering to journal-specific guidelines and addressing the expectations of journal editors.

Classroom discourse in English Language Teaching

 Classroom discourse in English Language Teaching (ELT) refers to the dynamic and interactive communication process between teachers and students in the classroom. It encompasses the various ways in which language is used to facilitate learning, manage classroom activities, and negotiate meaning. Key aspects of classroom discourse include:

1. *Teacher Talk Dominance*: Teachers typically dominate the conversation, with about 65-70% of the time spent on teacher talk, which often consists of lecturing or asking questions[3][4].

2. *Interaction Types*: Classroom discourse involves different types of interactions, such as:

   - *Elicitation*: The teacher elicits responses from students to engage them in the learning process[4][5].

   - *Informing Exchange*: The teacher provides information to students, which is a common type of interaction[5].

   - *Directing Exchange*: The teacher gives directions or instructions to students[5].

3. *Register Analysis*: This involves analyzing classroom discourse's register (field, mode, and tenor) to understand how language is used in different contexts. For example, a study using Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL) analyzed the register in classroom discourse, focusing on the field (subject matter), mode (formality), and tenor (relationship between participants)[2].

4. *Meaning Negotiation*: This involves the give-and-take process between teachers and students to construct knowledge and negotiate meaning. Students need to recognize the topic of the lesson, and teachers should produce verbal exchanges to construct students' knowledge[6].

5. *Discourse Analysis Frameworks*: Researchers use frameworks like Sinclair and Coulthard's model, which includes acts, moves, exchanges, transactions, and interactions, to analyze classroom discourse[4].

Understanding classroom discourse is crucial for effective teaching and learning in ELT settings, as it helps create a supportive and interactive environment that promotes student engagement and comprehension.

Enjoy VOA Learning English Videos

 



(19) VOA Learning English - YouTube

compilation of Parts of speech exercise

 Parts of speech exercise 1

Parts of speech exercise 2


Parts of speech exercise 3


Parts of speech exercise 4


Parts of speech exercise 5



More Parts of speech exercise


FREE TOEFL LISTENING EXERCISES

 

TOEFL Listening Practice - Free TOEFL Listening Test with Answers | BestMyTest TOEFL

Preparation I The TOEFL ITP Assessment Series (ets.org)

TOEFL ITP: Level 1 Section 1 Sample Questions (ets.org)

modality and concession in SFL appraisal system

 


Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL) views language as a resource for making meaning, and it categorizes language functions into three metafunctions: ideational, interpersonal, and textual. The interpersonal metafunction is particularly relevant to engagement, modality, and concession.

### Interpersonal Metafunction

The interpersonal metafunction concerns how language is used to negotiate and maintain relationships with others. It involves the management of social relations and the expression of social roles. This metafunction is realized through the Mood system, which includes modality and concession.

#### Modality

Comparing Tavassoli et al. (2019) Versus Risdianto et al. (2024)



When comparing these two references, Tavassoli et al. (2019) and Risdianto et al. (2024), we can assess their strengths and weaknesses based on the scope, methodology, context, and contribution to the field.

### **Strengths and Weaknesses of Tavassoli et al. (2019)**

**Strengths:**

1. **Established Journal**: Published in *Discourse & Society*, a well-regarded journal with a strong reputation in the field of discourse analysis and social linguistics.

2. **Focus on a Global Issue**: The study addresses the Syrian refugee crisis, a major global issue, allowing for broader relevance and interest.

3. **Appraisal Theory Application**: The paper effectively uses Martin and White's appraisal framework, offering a nuanced analysis of how British newspapers framed the refugee crisis.

4. **Comparative Analysis**: The study compares different newspapers, providing insights into how media stance varies across different outlets within the same cultural context.

Coba yang ini: 6 jurnal ELT gratis APC terindeks Scopus

 1. LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching  

https://e-journal.usd.ac.id/index.php/LLT/index
2. Journal of Language and Education (JLE) Q2 https://jle.hse.ru/
3. TESL-EJ: tesl-ej.org/wordpress/  Q1 GRATIS APC
4. Computer-Assisted Language Learning Electronic Journal https://callej.org/index.php/journal  Q1 GRATIS APC
5. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism Q1 Gratis APC  https://www.tandfonline.com/toc/rbeb20/current
6. Language Related Research  Q2 GRATIS APC http://lrr.modares.ac.ir/index.php?sid=14&slc_lang=en

What is mood and residue compared to theme and theme in Halliday's SFL?

 In Halliday's Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL), the concepts of **mood** and **residue** are distinct from **Theme** and **Rheme**. Here’s a comparison:

- **Theme** and **Rheme**: These terms refer to the structural components of a clause that organize the message. The **Theme** is the part of the clause that provides the starting point or the message's focus, while the **Rheme** is the part that elaborates or develops the message. The Theme-Rheme structure is crucial for understanding the flow of information in a text[1][3][4].

- **Mood** and **Residue**: These terms are part of the interpersonal metafunction in SFL. The **mood** refers to the clause's modality, which indicates the speaker's attitude or commitment to the proposition. The **residue** is the remainder of the clause after the mood has been identified, and it includes the subject and finite verbal operator[5].

In summary, while Theme and Rheme focus on the structural organization of the message, mood and residue focus on the interpersonal aspect of the clause, specifically on modality and the speaker's attitude.

Citations:

[1] http://www.isfla.org/Systemics/Print/Theses/ForeyThesis/Ch03.pdf

[2] https://eprints.uny.ac.id/66848/3/Bab%20II.pdf

[3] https://repository.unmul.ac.id/bitstream/handle/123456789/57324/Theme%20and%20Rheme%20Analysis.pdf?isAllowed=y&sequence=1

[4] http://lib.unnes.ac.id/39654/1/2201415086.pdf

[5] https://siakad.univamedan.ac.id/ojs/index.php/excellence/article/download/61/40

Identifikasi Sumber Data & Teknik Pengumpulan Data

 Identifikasi sumber data dan teknik pengumpulan data adalah proses yang penting dalam penelitian untuk memastikan bahwa data yang dikumpulkan relevan, akurat, dan dapat dipercaya. Berikut adalah definisi dan cara membuat identifikasi sumber data dan teknik pengumpulan data:

### Definisi Identifikasi Sumber Data

Identifikasi sumber data adalah proses menentukan dan mengidentifikasi sumber informasi yang akan digunakan dalam penelitian. Sumber data dapat berupa benda, gerak, manusia, tempat, dan lain-lain. Identifikasi ini penting untuk memastikan bahwa data yang dikumpulkan relevan dengan pertanyaan penelitian dan dapat memberikan informasi yang akurat[5].

### Definisi Teknik Pengumpulan Data

Teknik pengumpulan data adalah metode yang digunakan untuk mengumpulkan data dalam penelitian. Teknik ini dapat berupa survei, wawancara, observasi, dan lain-lain. Pemilihan teknik pengumpulan data harus sesuai dengan jenis penelitian dan tujuan penelitian[2][3].

Metadiscourse: Exploring Interaction in Writing (2005) by Ken Hyland

 In his book "Metadiscourse: Exploring Interaction in Writing" (2005), Ken Hyland discusses the concept of metadiscourse and its role in various genres, particularly in academic and professional writing. Here are some key points he made about genre:

1. **Metadiscourse and Genre Interaction**: Hyland emphasizes that different genres interact with their readers in distinct ways. For instance, metadiscourse is used in academic writing to guide readers through complex information and to signal the writer's attitude and understanding of the material. This interaction is crucial for engaging the audience and conveying the intended message effectively[3][4].

2. **Metadiscourse in Academic Genres**: Hyland examines how metadiscourse functions in various academic genres, such as research articles, abstracts, and other forms of academic writing. He highlights how metadiscourse markers like hedging, boosting, and attitude markers contribute to the rhetorical distinctiveness of these genres[3][4].

List jurnal bidang ELT, Linguistics & Culture di Jawa Tengah

 

Celt: A Journal of Culture, English Language Teaching & Literature: SINTA 2 APC 2,5 JUTA IDR: Celt: A Journal of Culture, English Language Teaching & Literature (unika.ac.id)

REGISTER JOURNAL SINTA 2 APC  150 USD/ 2 JUTA IDR: Register Journal (uinsalatiga.ac.id)

VISION UIN SEMARANG. SINTA 2. APC GRATIS LURRRR:  Editorial Policies (walisongo.ac.id)

JETLI UIN KUDUS. SINTA 2 FREE APC LURRR: Journal of English Teaching and Learning Issues (JETLI) does not charge authors fees for article submissions, processing, and publication (Free of Charge/APC).:  Editorial Policies (iainkudus.ac.id)

METATHESIS UNTIDAR MAGELANG SINTA 3: APC 350 RIBU: Submissions (untidar.ac.id)
LEKSEMA JOURNAL  SINTA 3 UIN SOLO. APC 500 RIBU Leksema: Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra (uinsaid.ac.id)

ERUDITE JOURNAL BELUM SINTA. UIN GUSDUR PEKALONGAN Erudita: Journal of English Language Teaching (uingusdur.ac.id). Sepertinya APC masih gratis karena belum terindeks di SINTA