UIN Salatiga Press Perkuat Pengelola Penerbit Perguruan Tinggi di Mukerda APPTI Jateng-DIY 2024
Working With Discourse: Meaning Beyond The Clause (Martin & Rose, 2007) : Why Martin's Model Of Register And Genre Is Theore...
The Study of SYNTAX, definition, focus and scope and important points
Studying English syntax involves analyzing how sentences are structured and organized within the English language. Below are the key components, focus, and important points related to this field of study.
### Definition
**Syntax** refers to the set of rules and principles that govern the structure of sentences in a language. It explores how words and phrases are arranged to create meaningful sentences, examining the relationships between different components within those sentences.
### Focus and Scope
1. **Sentence Structure**: Analyzing how words and phrases combine to form sentences, including the roles of clauses and phrases.
2. **Phrase Structure**: Understanding how different types of phrases (noun phrases, verb phrases, etc.) are organized within sentences.
Appraisal and ideology in news text reportage
The theoretical contribution of the paper "Appraisal and Ideology Realization in Indonesia State Capital Relocation News Texts" can be summarized into several key points:
1. **Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL) Framework**:
- The paper utilizes the SFL framework, specifically the appraisal system, to analyze news texts regarding the relocation of Indonesia's capital city. This framework provides a detailed method for examining how language constructs and conveys attitudes, engagement, and graduation in media discourse (Martin & White, 2005) [1].
2. **Appraisal System Analysis**:
- The study categorizes appraisal into three domains: attitude, graduation, and engagement. It demonstrates how these domains are used to shape public perceptions of the capital relocation project. For instance, the analysis shows a predominance of positive attitudes (67.2%) and heterogloss engagement (91.8%) in the news texts, indicating diverse perspectives and nuanced reporting (Risdianto et al., 2024) [1].
O,E & A:Ontologi, epistemologi, dan aksiologi
Ontologi, epistemologi, dan aksiologi adalah tiga cabang filsafat yang saling terkait dalam memahami pengetahuan dan realitas. Berikut adalah penjelasan dan contoh masing-masing:
### 1. **Ontologi**
**Definisi:** Ontologi adalah ilmu yang mempelajari hakikat atau wujud sesuatu yang ada. Ia bertanya tentang apa yang ada dan bagaimana sesuatu itu memiliki wujud[2][3][5].
**Contoh:**
- **Ontologi Pertemanan:** Pertemanan adalah suatu hubungan yang ada antara dua orang atau lebih. Dalam ontologi, kita mempelajari apa itu pertemanan dan bagaimana pertemanan tersebut memiliki wujud yang nyata dalam kehidupan sehari-hari[2].
- **Ontologi Rumah:** Rumah adalah tempat tinggal yang ada. Dalam ontologi, kita mempelajari apa itu rumah dan bagaimana rumah tersebut memiliki wujud yang nyata, seperti berupa rumah susun atau apartemen[6].
### 2. **Epistemologi**
Participial phrases and gerund phrases
Participial phrases and gerund phrases are both verbal phrases, but they function differently in a sentence.
### Participial Phrases
**Definition:** A participial phrase is a group of words that includes a participle (a verb form ending in -ing or -ed) and functions as an adjective, modifying a noun or pronoun in the sentence.
**Examples:**
1. **"Hopping through the forest,"** the rabbit noticed a new watering hole. (Here, "hopping through the forest" describes the rabbit.)
2. **"Running at high speed,"** the dog crashed into the wall. (Here, "running at high speed" describes the dog.)
### Gerund Phrases
**Definition:** A gerund phrase is a group of words that begins with a gerund (a verb form ending in -ing) and functions as a noun, often acting as the subject, direct object, indirect object, or complement of the sentence.
**Examples:**
Tuturan Fatis
Kerangka teori **tuturan fatis** pertama kali diperkenalkan oleh **Bronislaw Malinowski**, seorang antropolog yang meneliti masyarakat Papua Nugini. Tuturan fatis merujuk pada penggunaan bahasa yang tujuannya bukan untuk menyampaikan informasi atau ide, tetapi lebih untuk menjalin hubungan sosial atau menjaga keakraban. Tuturan ini seringkali terjadi dalam interaksi sehari-hari dan mencakup ungkapan-ungkapan yang bersifat rutin atau basa-basi.
### Teori Malinowski
Malinowski mengemukakan bahwa bahasa tidak hanya digunakan untuk menyampaikan informasi, tetapi juga sebagai alat untuk memperkuat ikatan sosial. Dalam konteks tuturan fatis, interaksi verbal bukan bertujuan untuk menyampaikan sesuatu yang informatif, tetapi lebih untuk "menjaga kontak" atau mempertahankan hubungan sosial antarindividu.
a timeline of key developments of Classroom Discourse analysis
The study of classroom discourse has a rich and evolving history, with significant milestones and contributions from various researchers. Here is a timeline of key developments:
1. **Early Work (1970s)**
- **Flanders (1970)**: Used an "introspective" a priori approach to study classroom discourse, as noted by Flowerdew (1990) and Love (1991) [1].
- **Mehan (1979)** and **Erickson and associates (1981, 1982)**: Employed educational ethnography to analyze classroom interactions [1].
2. **Sinclair and Coulthard (1975)**
- Introduced a comprehensive system of discourse analysis, which treated classroom discourse as a structured and hierarchical system. Their framework included five levels: acts, moves, exchanges, transactions, and interactions [1][4].
Halliday's Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL) and van Dijk's Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA)
Enhancing Scholarly Writing: Insights from the Workshop at Universitas Negeri Malang
The workshop was a timely response to the growing importance of academic research and publication in today’s academic landscape. The ability to communicate research findings effectively and navigate the intricacies of the publication process is indispensable for scholars and aspiring academics.
Faizal Risdianto, an accomplished scholar in his own right, brought a wealth of experience as a guest speaker. His presentation centred on the intricate journey from ideation to publication, offering a roadmap for aspiring authors. He highlighted the significance of clarity, structure, and originality in scholarly writing. Faizal Risdianto underscored the importance of adhering to journal-specific guidelines and addressing the expectations of journal editors.
Classroom discourse in English Language Teaching
Classroom discourse in English Language Teaching (ELT) refers to the dynamic and interactive communication process between teachers and students in the classroom. It encompasses the various ways in which language is used to facilitate learning, manage classroom activities, and negotiate meaning. Key aspects of classroom discourse include:
1. *Teacher Talk Dominance*: Teachers typically dominate the conversation, with about 65-70% of the time spent on teacher talk, which often consists of lecturing or asking questions[3][4].
2. *Interaction Types*: Classroom discourse involves different types of interactions, such as:
- *Elicitation*: The teacher elicits responses from students to engage them in the learning process[4][5].
- *Informing Exchange*: The teacher provides information to students, which is a common type of interaction[5].
- *Directing Exchange*: The teacher gives directions or instructions to students[5].
3. *Register Analysis*: This involves analyzing classroom discourse's register (field, mode, and tenor) to understand how language is used in different contexts. For example, a study using Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL) analyzed the register in classroom discourse, focusing on the field (subject matter), mode (formality), and tenor (relationship between participants)[2].
4. *Meaning Negotiation*: This involves the give-and-take process between teachers and students to construct knowledge and negotiate meaning. Students need to recognize the topic of the lesson, and teachers should produce verbal exchanges to construct students' knowledge[6].
5. *Discourse Analysis Frameworks*: Researchers use frameworks like Sinclair and Coulthard's model, which includes acts, moves, exchanges, transactions, and interactions, to analyze classroom discourse[4].
Understanding classroom discourse is crucial for effective teaching and learning in ELT settings, as it helps create a supportive and interactive environment that promotes student engagement and comprehension.
compilation of Parts of speech exercise
Parts of speech exercise 1
Parts of speech exercise 2
Parts of speech exercise 3
Parts of speech exercise 4
Parts of speech exercise 5
More Parts of speech exercise
modality and concession in SFL appraisal system
Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL) views language as a resource for making meaning, and it categorizes language functions into three metafunctions: ideational, interpersonal, and textual. The interpersonal metafunction is particularly relevant to engagement, modality, and concession.
### Interpersonal Metafunction
The interpersonal metafunction concerns how language is used to negotiate and maintain relationships with others. It involves the management of social relations and the expression of social roles. This metafunction is realized through the Mood system, which includes modality and concession.
#### Modality